Sunny Hostin = AKA Hypocrisy, and progressive at that
Sunny Hostin = AKA Hypocrisy.
Sunny Hostin has long been a prominent voice on issues involving sexual misconduct allegations and the treatment of accusers. In October 2018, while discussing the confirmation battle over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Hostin drew criticism after arguing that "a woman's word is enough," a statement opponents said conflicted with traditional due process principles. The comment in essence says that accusations alone should carry decisive weight when evaluating misconduct claims. (Kristine Marsh, "ABC Legal Analyst Sunny Hostin Argues Against Due Process: 'A Woman's Word is Enough!'", MRC NewsBusters, October 11, 2018. [https://archive.is/kn2OU])
Eight years later, that same Hostin has applied a different standard to Democratic Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner. In June 2026, Hostin stated on "The View" that she would "hold my nose" and vote for Platner despite a growing list of controversies surrounding his candidacy. According to reports, Hostin described Platner as "a liar, a racist, an antisemite," and a "homophobe," yet still expressed support for him as the Democratic nominee. (Alexander Hall, "'The View' erupts after Hostin declares 'I would hold my nose' and vote for scandal-plagued Graham Platner," Fox News June 3, 2026 [https://archive.is/11z1j]; Hanna Panreck, "Sunny Hostin supports Graham Platner despite calling him 'a liar, a racist, an antisemite'," Fox News, June 1, 2026. [https://archive.is/H265g])
At the same time, Platner was facing accusations from former romantic partners. The New York Times reported from three women who described volatile, toxic, and emotionally abusive behavior during past relationships. 'He hated women' - say accusers (Charles Creitz, Leo Briceno, Paul Steinhauser, "'He hated women': Explosive abuse, new Nazi tattoo allegations from exes rock Platner's campaign." Fox News, Jun 4, 2026 [https://archive.is/Rbdt7]). Coverage by Maine Public and Bangor Daily News summarized charges that included emotional abuse, intimidation, and threatening conduct. ("Graham Platner accused of volatile behavior by ex-girlfriends in new report," Maine Public, June 5, 2026 [https://archive.is/cWVWq]; "Women who dated Graham Platner describe 'toxic' relationships, NYT reports," Bangor Daily News, June 4, 2026 [https://archive.is/2qYJd].)
Further controversy emerged from archived Reddit posts uncovered during Platner's campaign. Platner made comments in 2013 dismissive of concerns about sexual assault in the military and skeptical of claims that institutions sometimes protect perpetrators. The resurfaced comments generated additional questions about his views on sexual assault and victim reporting.(Liz Goodwin, "Maine Senate candidate downplayed sexual assault concerns in deleted posts," WaPo, updated October 17, 2025. [https://t.co/HUom8FXI7g])
These facts show consistency. A public figure who once suggested that "a woman's word is enough" should be expected to treat allegations against a politically aligned candidate with the same seriousness she demanded in other cases. Supporting Platner despite both the allegations against him and his past comments on sexual assault can not reconcile with her earlier rhetoric regarding accusers and due process.
Sunny Hostin has long been a prominent voice on issues involving sexual misconduct allegations and the treatment of accusers. In October 2018, while discussing the confirmation battle over Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, Hostin drew criticism after arguing that "a woman's word is enough," a statement opponents said conflicted with traditional due process principles. The comment in essence says that accusations alone should carry decisive weight when evaluating misconduct claims. (Kristine Marsh, "ABC Legal Analyst Sunny Hostin Argues Against Due Process: 'A Woman's Word is Enough!'", MRC NewsBusters, October 11, 2018. [https://archive.is/kn2OU])
Eight years later, that same Hostin has applied a different standard to Democratic Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner. In June 2026, Hostin stated on "The View" that she would "hold my nose" and vote for Platner despite a growing list of controversies surrounding his candidacy. According to reports, Hostin described Platner as "a liar, a racist, an antisemite," and a "homophobe," yet still expressed support for him as the Democratic nominee. (Alexander Hall, "'The View' erupts after Hostin declares 'I would hold my nose' and vote for scandal-plagued Graham Platner," Fox News June 3, 2026 [https://archive.is/11z1j]; Hanna Panreck, "Sunny Hostin supports Graham Platner despite calling him 'a liar, a racist, an antisemite'," Fox News, June 1, 2026. [https://archive.is/H265g])
At the same time, Platner was facing accusations from former romantic partners. The New York Times reported from three women who described volatile, toxic, and emotionally abusive behavior during past relationships. 'He hated women' - say accusers (Charles Creitz, Leo Briceno, Paul Steinhauser, "'He hated women': Explosive abuse, new Nazi tattoo allegations from exes rock Platner's campaign." Fox News, Jun 4, 2026 [https://archive.is/Rbdt7]). Coverage by Maine Public and Bangor Daily News summarized charges that included emotional abuse, intimidation, and threatening conduct. ("Graham Platner accused of volatile behavior by ex-girlfriends in new report," Maine Public, June 5, 2026 [https://archive.is/cWVWq]; "Women who dated Graham Platner describe 'toxic' relationships, NYT reports," Bangor Daily News, June 4, 2026 [https://archive.is/2qYJd].)
Further controversy emerged from archived Reddit posts uncovered during Platner's campaign. Platner made comments in 2013 dismissive of concerns about sexual assault in the military and skeptical of claims that institutions sometimes protect perpetrators. The resurfaced comments generated additional questions about his views on sexual assault and victim reporting.(Liz Goodwin, "Maine Senate candidate downplayed sexual assault concerns in deleted posts," WaPo, updated October 17, 2025. [https://t.co/HUom8FXI7g])
These facts show consistency. A public figure who once suggested that "a woman's word is enough" should be expected to treat allegations against a politically aligned candidate with the same seriousness she demanded in other cases. Supporting Platner despite both the allegations against him and his past comments on sexual assault can not reconcile with her earlier rhetoric regarding accusers and due process.
Comments
Post a Comment